(Wait-if the original woman’s entire family was killed, where did a granddaughter come from?) The granddaughter of the woman noticed that Mannis had purchased the box and related the history behind it and how it was always called a Dibbuk (or Dybbuk) box. She escaped with some other prisoners and somehow made it to Spain, where she acquired the wine cabinet. Her entire family-parents, brothers, a sister, husband, two sons, and a daughter-were all killed. Mannis claimed to have purchased the box at an estate sale of a 103-year old Polish woman who, after growing up and raising a family, was sent to a Nazi concentration camp. The backstory is much too long for the scope of this article, so I’ll give you the CliffsNotes version. He proceeds to spin a tale of a paranormal experiences that rivals many horror films and seemed destined for the big screen itself (which it eventually did). In his eBay description, Mannis claimed to have acquired the box (thought to be a wine cabinet) at a 2001 estate sale. This allegedly haunted object first appeared in pop culture in a 2003 eBay auction from Kevin Mannis, a professional writer and recording artist from the Pacific Northwest (Broadjam 2018). As luck would have it, this is another one of the “Big Four” haunted objects in Zak Bagans Haunted Museum. However as found footage horrors go, it at least is filmed competently and is watchable.In this installment of my column, we’re going to focus on an item that I’ve wanted to write about for some time: the Dibbuk Box. It makes it all feel like a waste of time. Dybbuk Box: True Story of Chris Chambers does not deliver on this at all. These movies need a big finish to pay off investment where very little happens. The biggest disappointment though comes in the flat finale. Sound familiar? Sure, it’s a little different but cut from the exact same cloth. One particular scene sees Chris standing and staring at the camera for hours. The attempts to scare are subtle and would be worthy of praise if we hadn’t seen it done many times before. If there is one flaw in his acting, it is his muted reaction to some of the paranormal events that occur around him.Īs a wannabe Paranormal Activity, it’s to be expected that the film’s pacing is slow. Sure, a lot of his motivation and behaviour is pretty suspect but that’s a writing issue rather then an acting issue. She briefly pops in for a scene so the bulk of the film is carried by Chambers. There are just two actors, Chris Chambers and Sarah Bently. Not a problem as we are watching a movie but don’t try to tell your audience it’s real when it’s clearly not. However, it goes completely out the window later on. That might be believable at first when Chris is talking to the camera about the dybbuk box. Of course, it claims to be based on real events. Filmed with static cameras and one that Chris likes to hold. You see, while the YouTube dybbuk box opening might be somewhat original, it quickly drops all of that for things that go bump in the night. It’s hard to watch and not just think it’s ripping off a far more successful film series. Written and directed by Joseph Mazzaferro, this found footage horror was heavily inspired by the likes of Paranormal Activity. Did he unleash something demonic when he opened the box? Over the next few weeks, strange occurrences begin to happen around his home and his health begins to deteriorate. He finds one on the ‘dark web’ and opens it live. Wanting to get in on the popularity of the opening of dybbuk boxes on YouTube, Chris Chambers decides to get one himself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |